Vulva activism (also termed as vulvactivism[Herbenick, D., & Schick, V. (2011). Read my lips: A complete guide to the vagina and vulva. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.]) is the promotion of a raised awareness of the appearance of female genitalia and the breaking of taboos surrounding the vulva, as carried out by feminist movements and . Other names for this advocacy movement are labia pride, labia liberation, vulvaversity, viva la vulva, pussy positivity and similar. It is supported by several independent feminist groups and based on diverse channels of communication such as cyberfeminism, and advocating boycotts against physicians and clinics that make use of deceptive advertising.
Background
While the men's
Human penis often serves as a symbol of virility and prowess, the vulva is associated with contradictory and oftentimes negative evaluations and meanings in western society. It is strongly sexualized as the object of erotic desire, but it is also often regarded as ugly, disgusting and unclean: something to be ashamed of and hide. Unveiling or talking about the vulva are considered obscene, offensive and taboo in most situations. The term
vulva shaming is sometimes used for these phenomena.
[Oeming, M. (2018). In Vulva Vanitas – The Rise of Labiaplasty in the West. On Cliteridectomy, 70.] There are many stigmatizations and myths concerning the vulva. Many girls and women are insecure about the appearance of their genitals, but do not dare to bring up the topic with family and friends.
The anthropologist Carlos Sulkin depicts this connection as a culturally associative network, whereby the tabooing of the vulva and problematic ideals of beauty are closely linked. There is a cultural norm in Western culture to keep the vulva covered and concealed in public, to hide it and avoid it as a topic. In this context, unrealistic ideas of perfection and normativity thrive:
Many cultures, however, also have the opposite tendency to identify the vulva with powerful, mythical forces. This valuation of the vulva is found for both ancient European and non-European cultures. In these mythologies, for example, the belief prevails that disaster can be averted through the self-determined uncovering of the vulva, referred to as Anasyrma. This practice was used both in religious rituals, but was practiced in the context of secular festivals. Public exposure of the vulva became an act of empowerment.[ Vagina dentata: Why men throughout history have been terrified of vaginas with teeth - iNews]
Anasyrma has inspired modern feminist activists and has been incorporated in art projects and workshops such as Raising the Skirt and Anasyrma Army. The taboos and shame that affect the vulva in Western society are to be conquered and women are to find a relaxed way of dealing with the vulva again.[Blackledge, C. (2020). Raising the Skirt: The Unsung Power of the Vagina. Hachette UK, ISBN 147461583X]
Aims and objectives
The campaigns are intended to educate, empower and raise critical awareness about natural genital variation. Activists and supporters encourage women (and also men) to develop more positive attitudes towards the vulva and to accept anatomical variations as they are. Campaigners believe that the vulva should be seen as a normal part of the body that does not need to be hidden and made taboo, and that women should embrace that part of their body and stop being ashamed of their vulva.
The aim is to educate men and women about normal female anatomy and its variations and break taboos surrounding the vulva. To achieve this, the vulva is recontextualized, for example, through public display and discourse in explicitly non-sexual contexts.[Nurka, C. (2018). Female genital cosmetic surgery: deviance, desire and the pursuit of perfection. Palgrave Macmillan, ISBN 9783319964898][Chubak, B. (2020). Historical and Ethical Perspectives on Vulvoplasty. Sexual Medicine Reviews. ]
Ending vulva shaming
Although the vulva is still a taboo in today's society, it is subject to an unrealistic ideal of beauty. Unlike most other parts of the body, the vulva is usually covered in public and hidden from the gaze of others, as expressed in the term "private parts". Most heterosexual girls and women rarely see other vulvas besides their own. Male adolescents are often familiar with the appearance of vulvas only through pornographic images. Thus, for many people of both sexes, there are no realistic standards or possibilities for comparison.
Taken together, these are the conditions for which many women:
-
have a negative self-perception of their vulva and feel they have to be ashamed of it, and
-
for which unrealistic beauty standards develop. While such ideals exist for numerous body regions, most of which are also far from average, there is little or no opportunity to correct or relativize these standards through social comparison.
Addressing unrealistic beauty standards
The growing demand for labiaplasty surgery could be attributed to the fact that many women, as well as men, have unrealistic expectations regarding genital appearance. The cultural norm of covering the genitals in public creates a lack of a standard of comparison. Most explicit depictions of female genitalia that people are confronted with are produced by the
adult industry. Pornography is usually produced in a commercial context and primarily addresses male customers. Therefore, these depictions of female genitalia are often "beautified" to suit commercial need (or in some countries for legal reasons),
either by the selection of models with a certain anatomy or by
photoshopping the images. In practice, this means smoothing out irregularities and "digitally shortening" the
labia minora.
A 2020 study of 4,513 Canadian men and women directly addressed the question of what aesthetic preferences both sexes have regarding the vulva. For this purpose, photos of vulvas with and without labiaplasty were shown, and the participants were asked to rate them on the dimensions personal ideal (what they themselves consider ideal), societal ideal (what they think most other people consider to be ideal) and normalcy (how far does the depicted vulva correspond to the natural average). It was found that both men and women considered the vulvas after labiaplasty not only more attractive i.e. ideal (both societal and personal), but also more normal. This effect was even more pronounced for women than for men. Thus, vulvas with surgically removed or reduced labia minora were considered more normal than natural vulvas by most people. The authors conclude that:
A 2022 study using a similar methodology found natural, unaltered vulvas, when compared to vulvas that had undergone labiaplasty, to be rated as less normal and ideal, and to be considered disgusting. Of note, this effect is moderated by race and most pronounced for pre-operative white vulvas and post-operative black vulvas.[Oswald, F., Walton, K. A., Khera, D., Champion, A., & Pedersen, C. L. (2022). Evaluations of Black and White female genitalia by labiaplasty status: A pre-registered contextualization, replication, and extension of findings on labial perceptions. The Journal of Sex Research, 59(9), 1163-1174.] While, as expected, heterosexual men rate vulvas as more attractive than homosexual men, and heterosexual women rate vulvas as less attractive than lesbian women, the same pattern emerges here.[Oswald, F., Pedersen, C. L., & Matsick, J. L. (2022). Gayzing Women’s Bodies: Criticisms of Labia Depend on the Gender and Sexual Orientation of Perceivers. The Journal of Sex Research, 1-14.] A study conducted in Germany yielded similar findings, showing that naturally developed inner labia are considered to be ugly, disgusting, and a deformity that should ideally be surgically removed.[Kasten, E., & Hoffmann, K. (2019). Female genital esthetics: Comparison of preferences of men and women. Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie, 12, 95-103.]
The taboo and shameful public attitude towards the vulva is seen as the cause of these unrealistic expectations. Various initiatives aim to change this and want the vulva to be treated in public presentation and conversation as a normal body part. Demands include that female genitalia be allowed to be depicted in the popular press (i.e. without the legal requirement of "photoshopping" the labia away, as is the case e.g. in Australia), that parents use the anatomically correct terms in conversation with their children,[ Call It A Vulva: Why We Should Teach Kids Anatomical Terms For Genitals - A mighty girl] or that children's dolls such as Barbie not be shipped without vulvas[ Barbie needs to be given vulva - Metro][ Alarming trend sees young girls wanting ‘Barbie genitals’ Girls as young as 13 are requesting the surgery. - news.com.au] (in fact, "Barbie style" is a common term for an extensive form of labiaplasty in which the labia minora are completely removed[Gonzales-Alabastro, C., Eilber, K. S., Anger, J. T., & Berman, J. R. (2019). Female cosmetic genital reconstruction: a review of current trends, treatments, and techniques. Current sexual health reports, 11, 44-51.]).
Forms of activism
Muff March
The London-based feminist group
UK Feminista organized a protest march through
Harley Street, an area synonymous with its private medical providers, in December 2011.
More than 320 women paraded the street, with slogans like: "Keep your mits off our bits!", "There's nothing finer than my vagina!", and "Harley Street puts my chuff in a huff"
The "Muff March" has been criticized for putting too much emphasis on pornography as a root cause of the problem. (See Feminist views on pornography.)
New View campaign
New View is a New York City based, grassroots network of feminists, social scientists and health care providers. In a self-description, New View "is opposed to the growth of the unregulated and unmonitored genital cosmetic surgery industry that is medicalizing women's sexuality and creating new risks, norms and insecurities."
The group initiated several events with the aim of empowering women and raising awareness for the topic under names such as the
Vulvagraphics or
Vulvanomics. These include workshops to "celebrate the role of art in activism and to kick off a campus-based movement to celebrate genital diversity",
"flash activism" in front of surgeon's offices,
[ Flash activism - New View Campaign] conferences (
Framing the Vulva)
and street demonstrations.
Labia Pride
The name emphasizes the
labia, as the trend towards cosmetic surgery on the female genitals (
labiaplasty, also known as "designer vagina") has left many women insecure about the size and appearance of their labia.
Several feminist groups, such as Gynodiversity, the Large Labia Project, or 100 vulvas[ Why I photographed 100 vulvas - BBC] try to oppose the influence that pornography has on anatomic expectations. By encouraging women to release images of their vulvas and post photo submissions of anonymous vulvas on their websites, they want to establish a sphere for women to get realistic impressions of normal vulvas.
The campaign has faced criticisms over putting too much blame on the porn industry and the subjection to male desires, and ignoring the fact that many women have naturally small labia. The campaign has been criticized for giving the false impression that protruding labia are the anatomical norm and small inner labia are the adaptation to beauty standards:
Courageous Cunts
Courageous Cunts was a feminist website
founded in 2012, that focused on issues of body empowerment and genital self-awareness. Its primary concerns were the critical reception of women's health issues, sexualized
, and the sexual objectification of female bodies. Courageous Cunts considered itself to be part of the labia pride movement, with the aim of raising awareness for critical issues around
labiaplasty and empowering women to overcome body shame. The site ran a campaign during which women could publicly post photographs of their
to promote a natural genital image and protest against "porn aesthetics".
[
][
] Using the word "
cunt" as their name was an act of
reappropriation, as English professor
Germaine Greer argues that the ancient
vulgarism "is one of the few remaining words in the English language with a genuine power to shock".
Vulvaversity
Vulvaversity is a collective of committed artists and project makers originating in the German city of Freiburg im Breisgau. The project is dedicated to demystifying the vulva and making it visible. The project clears up ideas of norms and wants to encourage people to overcome the shame regarding vulvas that has developed over many centuries. Vulvaversity wants to dispel the myth of the vulva as it is portrayed in mainstream pornography in particular. As a vehicle for this visualization, Vulvaversity produced calendars, notepads, shopping lists, and postcards. Vulvaversity deliberately refrains from aestheticizing or artistically depicting the photographed vulvas and thus shows unadulterated, unchanged images. The collective organizes film and discussion evenings, rooms for exchange, lectures and talks, and always provides the possibility to have a photo of one's own vulva taken in a mobile photo studio to have it published.
[ Schamlos glücklich: Warum sich jeder eine Vulva an die Wand hängen sollte - Go Feminin][ Der Vulva-Abreißkalender aus Freiburg ist schon ausverkauft - Badische Zeitung]
See also
Art projects
-
Vagina and vulva in art (and also Clitoris § Contemporary art and Erotic art)
-
101 Vagina, an Australian photo-book self-published in 2013
-
Femalia, an American photo-book edited by Joani Blank and first published by Down There Press in 1993
-
The Dinner Party, an installation by Judy Chicago
-
Megumi Igarashi, a Japanese artist who made a kayak out of a model of her vulva
-
Jamie McCartney, a British artist best known for his work Great Wall of Vagina
-
The Cunt Coloring Book by Tee Corinne. An adult themed coloring book of various vulvas.
Protests
External links